Start typing to search contracts, clauses, cast, and terms. Arrows ↑↓ to navigate, Enter to open.

Компанія

Horizon

Horizon Maritime Analytics Oy

Юрисдикція
Finland (Helsinki)
Право
Finnish law, governing law Finland or UK per deal
Індустрія
Vessel-route optimisation and emissions telemetry SaaS for shipping
Розмір
Series B, ~120 employees
Особистість
Engineering-led, direct, low patience. Head of Engineering does legal reviews in the margin. Obsessive about IP and escrow because a previous vendor left half-compiled code behind. Pays on time, short terms (14 days).

Horizon Maritime Analytics Oy

Horizon is what happens when an engineering team runs procurement. Their Head of Engineering reads the MSA line by line and leaves margin comments. Their legal team is one part-time contractor who defers to him. Meetings are 23 minutes, on camera, on time. The word "committee" is never said.

They move fast. They decide fast. And they carry a very specific kind of trauma from a previous vendor who went bust mid-project and left them with half-compiled services and no handover documentation. That story is the shape of every contract ask they've ever made to us.

Why they hire us

Core platform work on their vessel-routing and emissions-telemetry backend. Heavy event-sourcing, big data pipelines, and integrations with port-authority systems across Northern Europe. Phase 1 was a rebuild of their ingestion layer; Phase 2 is the modelling and forecasting stack on top of it.

What they push on

  • IP transfer. They started out asking for milestone-based IP transfer instead of our default rolling transfer. We ended up keeping rolling but adding an SLA handover addendum that satisfies their actual concern (not losing continuity).
  • Escrow. They asked for code escrow with a third-party provider. We declined; the SLA addendum covers the continuity risk without the ceremony.
  • Handover package. Spelled out at commit-level granularity: README, ADRs, deployment pipelines, credentials rotation, on-call runbook.

What they don't push on

  • Payment terms. Net-14, always on time, never disputed. They'd rather pay fast and get priority attention than negotiate terms down.
  • Rate increases. Accepted our 10% annual cap without comment. As their Head of Engineering put it: "If you're worth what you charge, charge more. If you're not, we'll find out."

Story threads

  • The ghost of the previous vendor shapes every clause. We refer to them internally as "the ghost" when explaining Horizon's asks to new team members.
  • Returning clients with new procurement leads sometimes try to invoke prior negotiated addenda as binding precedent. Write a fresh addendum under the new context instead.
  • When asked off-the-record whether non-solicit can reach staff who have moved to a different client, the answer is usually "no" — and an honest "no" is better for the relationship than a polite dodge.